
The offence of criminal conspiracy, defined at Article 450-1 of the Criminal Code, regularly raises the question of its accumulation with the substantive offences it was intended to prepare, in light of the non bis in idem principle, which the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation has consistently interpreted in a restrictive sense.
The legal definition of criminal conspiracy
Criminal conspiracy is established by any group formed or any agreement entered into for the preparation, characterised by one or more material acts, of one or more crimes or of one or more offences punishable by at least five years' imprisonment. The offence is autonomous: it is constituted by the agreement itself, independently of the actual commission of the offences that were prepared.
The principle of accumulation with substantive offences
The Court of Cassation regularly recalls that criminal conspiracy may be added to the substantive offences prepared, since the legal interests protected are distinct: the agreement to commit offences, on the one hand, and the offences themselves, on the other. This accumulation considerably increases the sentences faced.
The limits set by case law on this accumulation
However, the Criminal Chamber has refined its position to avoid prosecuting the same conduct twice. Where the same material act underlies both the conspiracy charge and the substantive offence, the courts must distinguish the planning conduct from the executory conduct. The defence has every interest in challenging the very characterisation of the conspiracy, by demonstrating the absence of preparatory material acts distinct from the offence itself.
Practical consequences for the defence
The strategy consists, first, of contesting the existence of an organised group or of a prior agreement, and second, of pressing the prosecution to clearly identify the material acts attributable to each charge. This twofold line of attack, combined with a precise analysis of the file, can lead to the dismissal of the conspiracy charge, with significant impact on the sentence imposed.
About the author

Maître Charles Bruguière
Avocat pénaliste au Barreau de Paris
Avocat à la Cour, Maître Charles Bruguière exerce exclusivement en droit pénal. Il intervient en urgence 24h/24 à Paris et sur tout le territoire pour la défense des personnes mises en cause.
Learn more about the firmEmergency intervention
Concerned by this type of proceedings?
Bruguière Law Firm intervenes in emergencies across France. Confidential initial exchange, reply within 24 hours.

